By Racheal Ayodele A witness identified as Dayo Israel has told the Lagos State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal headed by Ju...
By Racheal Ayodele
A witness identified as Dayo Israel has told the Lagos State
Governorship Election Petition Tribunal headed by Justice Arum Ashom, that
Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and his wife, Ibijoke were allowed to cast their
votes with invalid voter cards.
Dayo Isreal who was the Labour Party, LP, agent was summoned
to testify in the petition filed by the party’s gubernatorial candidate in the
March 18 2023 election, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour, to nullify the return of
governor SanwoOlu.
While being led in evidence by the Rhodes-Vivour’s lead
counsel, Olumide Ayeni SAN, Israel informed the court that he served as an
agent for the Labour Party in Unit 006, Ward 15, Lagos Island Local Government
in the election.
He said, ”I observed that the card reader showed their cards
to be invalid but Sanwo-Olu and his wife were allowed to cast their votes and
this is against INEC’s electoral process.”
Under cross-examination from counsel to INEC, Charles
Edosomwan, SAN, the witness also claimed he was beaten up that day by
supporters of the All Progressives Congress, APC.
“I’m not a Labour Party member but I was assigned as an
agent. When the APC thugs recognised me as the party’s agent, they beat me up.
And also threatened to beat voters if they did not vote for APC.”
When asked by counsel to Governor Sanwo-Olu, Muiz Banire,
SAN, to describe how he was beaten. Israel said, “During the casting of votes,
four of them beat me up. I ran away, changed my clothes to disguise myself and
came back to monitor the counting of votes.”
Similarly, another subpoenaed witness, who is the State
secretary of the Labour Party in Lagos, Sam Okpala, also testified before the
tribunal, led by counsel to the petitioner, Folagbade Benson, the subpoena was
tendered before the court through the witness, a situation which led to another
round of objections from the respondents.
In its ruling, the Tribunal noted the objections of the
respondents but proceeded to hear the testimony of the witness while ordering
the respondents to include their objections in their final written addresses.
The Court, however, adjourned the continuation of the
hearing in the petition till July 3.
No comments